Monthly recap: For the month of January, FDCPA cases are up, FCRA cases are down over January 2009.

  • 716 FDCPA (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act), vs. 551 in January 2009
  • 77 FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act), vs. 109 in January 2009
  • 5  TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act), vs. 1 in January 2009
  • 39  TILA (Truth in Lending Act)

FDCPA and Other Consumer Rights Lawsuit Statistics, January 16-31, 2010

There were about 465 lawsuits filed under consumer statutes in the second half of January. Here is an approximate breakdown:

  • 403 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
  • 43 Fair Credit Reporting Act
  • 1 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
  • 15 Truth In Lending Act
  • 1 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
  • 1 Electronic Fund Transfers Act
  • 1 Fair Credit Billing Act
  • 1 Home Ownership And Equity Protection Act
  • 3 State of California Consumer Statutes
  • 1 State of Florida Consumer Statutes
  • 1 State of Indiana Consumer Statutes
  • 2 State of Maryland Consumer Statutes
  • 1 State of Massachusetts Consumer Statutes
  • 1 State of Michigan Consumer Statutes
  • 2 State of West Virginia Consumer Statutes
  • 7 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
  • 1 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

Summary:

  • Of those cases, there were about 484 unique plaintiffs (including multiple plaintiffs in one suit).
  • Of those plaintiffs, about 141 had sued under consumer statutes before.
  • Combined, those 141 plaintiffs have filed about 801 lawsuits since 2001
  • Actions were filed in 104 different US District Court branches.
  • About 303 different collection firms and creditors were sued.

The top courts where lawsuits were filed:

  • 30 Lawsuits: Illinois Northern District Court – Chicago
  • 24 Lawsuits: Minnesota District Court – DMN
  • 24 Lawsuits: Colorado District Court – Denver
  • 18 Lawsuits: New York Western District Court – Buffalo
  • 18 Lawsuits: California Central District Court – Western Division – Los Angeles
  • 17 Lawsuits: Pennsylvania Middle District Court – Scranton
  • 17 Lawsuits: Michigan Eastern District Court – Detroit
  • 16 Lawsuits: Arizona District Court – Phoenix
  • 16 Lawsuits: Georgia Northern District Court – Atlanta
  • 16 Lawsuits: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court – Philadelphia

The most active consumer attorneys were:

  • Representing 20 Consumers: Matthew William Kiverts
  • Representing 19 Consumers: Brent F. Vullings
  • Representing 17 Consumers: Kenneth R. Hiller
  • Representing 17 Consumers: Nicholas J. Bontrager
  • Representing 14 Consumers: Todd Michael Friedman
  • Representing 12 Consumers: Adam Theodore Hill
  • Representing 12 Consumers: Kenneth W. Pennington
  • Representing 12  Consumers: Ryan Scott Lee
  • Representing 11  Consumers: Phillip C. Rogers
  • Representing 11  Consumers: David Michael Larson

Statistics Year to Date:

851 total lawsuits for 2010, including:

  • 716 FDCPA
  • 77 FCRA
  • 5  TCPA
  • 39  TILA (Truth in Lending Act)

Number of unique Plaintiffs: 881 (including multiple plaintiffs in one suit)

The most active consumer attorneys of the year:

  • Representing 36 Consumers: Ryan Scott Lee
  • Representing 34 Consumers: Brent F. Vullings
  • Representing 32 Consumers: Matthew William Kiverts
  • Representing 27 Consumers: Adam Theodore Hill
  • Representing 26 Consumers: Todd Michael Friedman

About WebRecon LLC: Creditors and collection firms use WebRecon’s services to easily segregate predictably litigious consumers from their databases. A significant percentage of consumer litigation is initiated by the same consumers over and over again, and screening them out of the general population can reduce lawsuits by as much as a third.

API Access


We offer two powerful APIs to businesses that communicate with consumers:

  • The primary Litigious Consumer Scrub uses a combination of name, geography (and optionally SSN) to identify consumers who have filed lawsuits in the past.
  • The Litigious Consumer Phone Scrub pulls every phone number from our proprietary database of litigants and runs your phones against ours.

These APIs allow you to check your data against our database on the fly. Clients love using this to handle risk management without missing a beat in their daily workflow.

Workers Comp Scrub


Workers Comp-inspired FDCPA lawsuits are growing aggressively, particularly in Florida. Only WebRecon can tell you who in your database may have a Florida Worker’s Comp case filed that could trigger litigation against you.

You can’t stop 100% of all lawsuits, but if you collect medical in Florida and you don’t have a process in place to show the court that you have a way to check every file against the Workers Comp database, then you have lost the case before it even begins.

Knock these suits out of the park with the Workers Comp Scrub.

Our Monthly Client Newsletter with The Litigant Hotsheet


Anyone can get our guest newsletter, but only clients get the version with the Litigant Hotsheet –  identifying the most active consumer Plaintiffs filing suit in jurisdictions around the country each month. Grab a coffee, shut your door and open your database to make sure you are doing all you can to stay safe.

Individual Vendor Consumer Complaint Search


Just like Vendor Monitoring, but without the monitoring. Search any business’s history of consumer complaints (Litigation, CFPB, BBB, State AG) with the click of a button! Great for on-the-fly gut checks of the companies you do business with.

Vendor Monitoring


Through vicarious liability, you can be held accountable for the bad behavior of your vendors. If they abuse consumers, for all intents and purposes, so do you. This is a big freakin’ deal!

But fear not, friend. WebRecon can track consumer litigation, CFPB, BBB and State AG Office complaints against the companies you do business with.

When a new complaint of any kind is filed against any of the companies you are monitoring, we’ll automatically push a report out to you with all of the publicly available details so you can react accordingly and if necessary, protect your interests.

The Litigious Consumer Phone Scrub


Would you knowingly dial a number attached to a consumer with a history of litigation? Of course not.

But thousands of companies do just that, every single day. If you’d like to know who they are, simply review the court dockets. They are the ones getting sued the most.

Sure, you can stop dialing consumers. But your marketing and operations teams might not be too excited about that plan.

Another idea? Identify the consumers most likely to sue you, based on previous litigation histories, and just don’t call them.

Identify high-risk phones quickly & easily, before you expose yourself to unnecessary risk.

Litigation Context Search


This is really cool.

Our primary search engine is really designed to search for parties to litigation. Need to know more about a consumer plaintiff? That’s easy. Defendant? Check. Lawyer? No problem.

But if you need to find all 1099C lawsuits filed in July 2020… not so much.

Which is why we developed the Context Search. We have pulled out and indexed the full text from over 140k consumer lawsuits and made them available to you in a search engine, with more than 1000 new lawsuits added each month. Use it to search the text of filed litigation so you can easily identify those hard-to-define trends and cases worth following.

Individual Search Engine


Instantly and easily search our proprietary database for any lawsuit participant – Plaintiff, Defendant or Attorney.

In the results, we’ll show you the full consumer litigation history of any participant, including the “docket data” (who, what, why, where, when) and – in many cases – we can even provide a copy of their actual filed lawsuits.

You can also search by phone, date range, federal/state, class action, court, statute, etc. We offer a ton of flexibility to get you the exact search result you are looking for.

The Litigant Alert Ongoing Monitoring Process


Just like our one-time batch process, but without the whole “one time” thing.

When one of your consumers files new litigation against anyone in the future, you should be the first to know. Our monitoring service can make that happen.

WebRecon can monitor your entire database (or any segment of it) for future instances of consumer litigation filed by the very consumers you are working with, right now!

It is simple to add new consumers to the watchlist, remove inactive accounts, download full reports, etc.

Best of all, we only charge you for the volume of your monitoring database – not the frequency of the searches. Search daily, weekly, every Tuesday and Friday, the 15th of each month, whatever – it is totally up to you! You won’t pay a penny more.

The Litigant Alert One-Time Batch Process


This is our flagship service. Find out why hundreds of companies won’t contact any consumers before running them through WebRecon’s Litigant Alert.

This process identifies consumers with a history of litigation quickly & easily. If they have ever filed lawsuits under FDCPA, TCPA, FCRA or similar statutes, you’ll find out here. 

WebRecon’s proprietary database is simply the most comprehensive collection of dangerous consumer litigation data in existence. 

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.